Selling Water by the River – by Shane Hipps

Earlier, I described the book, Red Letter Revolution by Shane Claiborne and Tony Campolo, as “charging out of the gate, to finally cross the finish line at a gentle saunter. Not so with Shane Hipps’, Selling Water By the River, published by Jericho Books. This book, which begins as a casual stroll, warms up to an aggressive, ambitious tour de force.

One gets the sense early on that parishioners at Mars Hill Church in Michigan, where Hipps has been serving as pastor, have heard much of this material already in some form. Hipps is a master of metaphor, and one assumes that he employs the deft use of this tool in his sermons as well as his writings.

I have found Hipps’ previous writings to be helpful, if only in the sense that he brings some important ideas to a more popular audience. His writing and speaking on media theory, for instance, is good, but will seem somewhat simplistic to those who have read Marshall McLuhan, or even Rex Miller, and others. This is not a criticism, but rather a recognition of Hipps’ audience and voice.

As I read the first 4 chapters of Selling Water by the River, I found myself assuming that I would be characterizing this book in a similar way. Good martial, but if you’ve read McLaren or Rollins, or even Shane’s predecessor at Mars Hill, Rob Bell, this will seem like lighter faire.

And then came chapter 5. My left eyebrow raised in amused interest. The metaphors started to get more interesting, the ideas behind them more stirring. Things began to warm up. Upon completion of the book one gets the impression that Hipps serves us some light appetizers in the beginning, with the clear intent of preparing our palette for the more substantial meal to come.

There is a clear changing of courses, for instance, between the very conventional metaphor of The Wind and the Sails (chapter 3) and Shedding the Swaddle (chapter 5).

The main course? For me, it came in chapters 8 and 9, The Constant Gardner and The Hidden Treasure.

In the chapter titled, The Constant Gardner, Hipps compares the type of care employed for the Mona Lisa, at the Louvre in Paris, with the type of care provided by a gardner at a botanical garden. Two very different approaches. One with a glass case and a scary looking guard, and one with a nurturing gardener, tending, watering and shaping the very subject of her care.

As Hipps writes…

“The gardener and the guard had two very different types of jobs. The guard’s job was to protect and preserve an ancient artifact. The gardener’s job was to cultivate and promote the growth of living things.” (p. 108)

Hipps makes the point that if the approaches to care were swapped, the painting would be destroyed and the plants of the garden would most certainly die.

“The key…is understanding the object so the wrong methods are not applied.” (pp. 108-109)

Again, Hipps writes…

“The same is true when it comes to our relationship to the message of Jesus – the gospel. We must accurately understand the nature of the gospel if we are to treat it with the proper care.” (pg. 109)

Hipps goes on to make the case for a trajectory of a growing and ever widening gospel. In this way, Hipps argues, perhaps the gospel is more like a plant than a painting. Maybe the gospel is less in need of guards than gardeners.

There’s more of this type of thoughtful, compelling material to follow. I hope I’ve whetted your appetite. This meal is well prepared.

In the end, Hipps is taking particular, and sometimes complex, matters of philosophy, theology and hermeneutics, and wrapping them in simplified language and metaphor. And, in this case, it’s effective – even for a guy like me, who might not be quite as much of an intellectual as he thinks he is.

Idol

I’ve spent an unusual amount of time on YouTube over the last several days as I’ve been bound to the couch, recuperating from knee surgery. This is always dangerous, as I begin with material I’m genuinely interested in, but the algorithms YouTube uses to suggest associated content inevitably leads me down a path to where I eventually find myself watching videos directly opposed to my original interest.

Along these lines, I was listening to a sermon by a well-know pastor last night. I was drifting off into sleep as I began to hear things that I had to playback to make sure I was hearing correctly. I was so stunned that I decided to jot down some of the statements, verbatim.

I’m not going to identify this pastor, because I’m not sure there is any benefit to that, but I’m very curious about how others might respond to some of his statements.

This is what he said:

“Christian ministry has one clear duty, and that is to bring to people the truth of God revealed in the Scripture by explaining it’s meaning. The meaning of the Scripture is the revelation from God. I have no other responsibility in my duty to represent the Lord Jesus Christ than to explain to you the meaning of his revelation. God has revealed himself in one book. We are ministers of this one book. In a sense, we are brokers of this one book… The simple instruction of 2 Timothy 4:2 “preach the word,” sums up that duty. There is nowhere in Scripture where we are commanded to do anything else. We are to PREACH  -  THE   –   WORD… meaning: the revelation of God contained in Scripture.”

And a little later in the same sermon:

“The Holy Spirit works only through the word. The Holy spirit uses the word of God as the means of saving. The only tool the Spirit has is the Scripture. Where the Scripture is replaced by anything else, the work of the Spirit is hindered. There might be a large crowd. They might be having a great time. They might enjoy the rock and roll concert that usually precedes the insipid, inane talk. But, that’s not where the Spirit of God is.”

Lord, have mercy.

What is this!? Can anyone help me here?

Torn: Rescuing the Gospel from the Gays-vs.-Christians Debate

I first came into contact with Justin Lee’s organization, The Gay Christian Network (GCN), last summer. Since then, I’ve been impressed by the spirit of this organization. And I’ve been awaiting the publication of Torn with much anticipation.

Torn: Rescuing the Gospel from the Gays-vs.-Christians Debate is Lee’s first book, published by the fledgling Jericho Books.

Torn is an effortless read in one sense, with just the right mix of personal narrative and compelling information to easily keep the reader engaged. But, in another sense, this book is anything but an easy read.

I was deeply moved and troubled by Justin’s story. Reading about his sincere and tenacious commitment to Christ and “biblical faithfulness” in the context of profound confusion and misunderstanding is excruciating. His exposé of the tragically failed and painfully dishonest “ex-gay” movement is both enlightening and infuriating. That material may be the most shocking and eye-opening part of the book for non-gay readers seeking understanding.

Lee’s tone in the book, best exemplified in the final chapter titled, “The Way Forward,” is one of bridge-building, with an emphasis on discussion and dialogue over arguments and conversion. That is, after all, what GCN is all about, and it is what sets them apart. And yet, I can’t help but wonder if the sincerely irenic approach employed so deftly by Lee and his organization may, in the end, change a whole lot of minds, especially in Lee’s Evangelical context.

Readers sincerely wrestling with the issue of sexual orientation as it relates to Biblical interpretation and Christian conviction will find that Lee covers the bases pretty well. He discusses prevailing theories on “why people are gay” and makes a compelling case against some common misconceptions. His challenge to the problematic “distant father – overbearing mother” theory is particularly helpful.

Political aspects of the debate are completely avoided. For that I am thankful. There is a place for such discussions, but I’m glad that Lee sets those aside for this project.

Lee does include the obligatory treatment of the relevant Biblical passages. Nothing new here if you’re familiar with the exegetical arguments. At least, that’s what the reader may assume at first. Lee does a great job of explaining the two sides of the Biblical argument. But things get more interesting as he ultimately concedes that the best conclusions he can muster are too ambiguous to “resolve” the issue for him.

Rather, his breakthrough, Biblically speaking, comes not so much by way of new understandings of a few specific passages, but rather a deeper understanding of the message of Jesus and the Bible as a whole. This insight, in the end, may be the most important part of the book.

Justin says he is a sincere believer who is willing to go wherever Christ clearly leads him. He says he wants to be faithful to Christ and the Scripture. He is also gay. He says he didn’t choose to be gay, though he certainly tried to choose not to be.

I believe him, and I think others will as well.

How important is this book in the ongoing discussion of sexual orientation in the Evangelical context? Time will tell. But I have a hunch that the book I’m holding in my hand is going to make an impact where others have failed.

What Are We Wrong About?

The story of the Christian Church is replete with revision, renewal and reform. Our history is marked by a consistent trajectory of reassessment and shifting understanding. In fact, I would argue that the Church’s willingness to change is a key dynamic to her health and vibrancy.

Not that change has always come easily. It hasn’t. Just ask Galileo. But, where do you suppose the Church would be today if we were still clinging to our “Biblical” conviction that the Earth was anchored immovably at the center of our universe?

What if we were still using the Bible to justify racial prejudice in our country, or deny women the right the vote?

Put simply, we’ve been wrong about some things, and we’ve shown a willingness, albeit at times reluctantly, to change our thinking. Far from undermining our faith, this dynamic has been a powerful affirmation of the viability and authenticity of our tradition.

Furthermore, given our history, there is no reason to assume that this dynamic has played itself out. In fact, historically speaking, there is every reason to assume that we are wrong about some things now, and that more changes are coming.

In light of this, I am perplexed when I come up against the assumption that we’ve got all the kinks worked out at this point.

Really?

I’ll bet not.

Rather, I’m confident that there are beliefs we hold to now that our grandkids will find every bit as obsolete as Biblically supported geocentricism or racism.

I’m thinking of some issues that society and the Church are wrestling with in these days, and I’m wondering which one(s) will soon become a part of our rich history of humble reform.

Turning the Page II


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


In my previous post, I mentioned an email from a fellow at our church. With his permission, I am providing the full quote from his email. I think it’s pretty insightful.

I teach Political Science…and am a bit of a political junkie, so I have thought a bit on this subject. I think the increasing religious pluralism of our post-Christian reality is less a threat to Christian freedom than it is to Christian privilege. We as Christians for so long have been playing with a stacked deck, socially and politically. We have been able to use our power as the religious majority to crowd our minority voices and force a facade of Christian morality on a truly unrepentant people.

I would argue that this strength was a weakness.

In this new era of religious pluralism, we, as followers of Jesus, can no longer make the easy assumption that others share our worldview. We can’t have sloppy theology or hide behind big Christian words when challenged to explain the radical, wonderful, illogical mystery of the gospel. Identification with Jesus no longer comes without a social cost. As being a Christian becomes harder and harder, those who follow the Rabbi are forced to become more and more like him. Furthermore, on a level playing field where all religions and non-religions are giving equal validity, Jesus must be the one to show Himself “the way, the truth, and the life”.

God must be the one to defy the odds….and I like those odds. 

Turning the Page

This brief presentation by Gideon Strauss fits in with some recent discussions we’ve been having at PRC.

Some of us suspect that the pluralistic turn in the West may be less a matter of decreased belief, and more a matter of increased authenticity. In other words, we’re just becoming more honest as a society about how we think and feel. That’s not to say that beliefs aren’t shifting, it’s simply that, at the very least, some of the shift is being driven by a move to more honest expression and dialogue. Possibly, a net positive.

For us Christians, who often speak of the value of accountability, I hope we can see the potential positive of being held more accountable for what we truly believe and live out in the public square. May we have ears to hear.

At any rate, I believe that there is cause for great hope in the idea that Christian expression in the public square might shift from the yin and yang of passivity and antagonism, to that of creative, redemptive energy.

The common Christian canard that our tradition isn’t treated fairly in a culture that celebrates diversity and openness to “every religion but ours,” may or may not be true – but to whatever extent it may be, we should be thoughtful in our assessment of why. Maybe it really is a matter of our society’s destain for the message of Jesus. Or, maybe it’s just that we’ve been jerks.

A fellow in our church that teaches political science suggested in a recent email that we are not going to see a loss of our rights as Christians in America, but we are going to see a loss of Christian privilege.

No one likes to lose the privileges they’ve come to enjoy.

I think this is what is really driving the “taking our country back” mantra, heard so often from politically conservative Christians. It is understandable that we would want to cling to the power and privilege that has contributed so much to our sense of comfort and safety. And yet, I wonder how that meshes with the life and message of Jesus.

Strauss argues for a respectful, communal Christian voice in society – not that we think we will usher in “the New Jerusalem” thereby – we shouldn’t make the mistake of “immanentizing the eschaton.” But rather, in his words, we should embrace that, “The New Jerusalem comes to us as a gift, but the Hope of the world to come calls us forward now to practice convicted civility, principled pluralism, and to shape a society marked by symphonic justice.”

This is classic Christian teaching (Matthew 5.13-16) in fresh skin. There is something about the message of Jesus that is constantly renewing itself, bursting the old skins of our language and traditions (Luke 2.22) and moving us to the next page of the story God is writing.

“Post-Christian” America is here. It’s time to turn the page.

The Party Sermon

As Thomas said in his message yesterday, “Some people tell me they are praying for me to ‘do the right thing.’”

Yesterday was the first time, in this political season, that we have given significant emphasis to the theme of politics at PRC. Some folks have been suggesting that we needed to be talking more about the upcoming election for a while – such encouragement generally always attached (subtly or not so subtly) to the sentiment that we should be helping our church understand which way Christian’s should vote.

Here are a couple of reasons why I think yesterday’s theme was a good idea:

  • A significant humber of folks were wondering why we weren’t talking about it more. Where were the voter guides?
  • We need to address the fact that some of the most un-Christlike attitudes and mean-spirited things tend to come out of Christian people’s mouths in the context of politics. Far to often, the fruits of the Spirit (peace, patience, kindness and self-control) are set-aside.

The sermon isn’t up yet on the internet, but here are the 4 main points, under the heading of why we haven’t talked about politics more at Pulpit Rock Church:

1. Our job is to love both Democrats and Republicans and keep them on speaking terms in a kingdom where the only party is in heaven.

2. During a politically charged season, comments are often taken out of context and misconstrued.

3. Our church is trying to follow a Christ who:

  • Shunned earthly power
  • Rejected political identification
  • Taught us that the law would never redeem us, and that all that we truly hunger for in this world is realized fully in Christ and is something no political party can take away.

4. I am increasingly concerned about a Christianity whose hope rises or falls with a political party.

Thomas followed this forth point with these words:

I am increasingly concerned about a Christianity whose hope rises or falls with a political party. Especially when…

  • Both political parties have people who love Jesus and are seeking to follow him
  • Both parties have some ideas and agendas that seem to line up with kingdom values
  • Both political parties are also in desperate need of reform and are not fully aligned with the gospel.
  • Both political parties are fueled by greed and power
  • Both political parties prey on fear and anger and attack
  • Both political parties need the prophetic voice of the gospel

The bottom line of yesterday was… it’s great to vote! Vote as a Christian. Get involved. If there is a candidate you believe in, support them, even campaign for them if you feel so inclined. These are good things.

But, as you vote as a Christian, make sure you are also acting like one. It’s not OK to treat those Christians who might be voting differently than you as second class citizens. And, don’t make the mistake of hanging your hopes on the political process or a particular party.

Don’t be fearful.

We also took the opportunity to pray for the upcoming elections and you can read that prayer here.

Election Prayer at PRC

 

Here’s the prayer we’ve crafted for our services this weekend at Pulpit Rock Church:

God of all creation, maker of all things and lover of our hearts, we come before you today.

We remember all those who have been affected by the powerful storm on the East Coast. We pray for your peace in the midst of chaos and your hope in the midst of suffering. We pray for unity in the affected communities, and that your Church would rise up as a people of hope – and practical help and healing.

May your love and grace saturate the places of greatest need.

And, Father, we lift our hearts to you this morning as we consider this week’s elections. We rejoice in the freedoms we enjoy to wrestle with difficult issues and make our voices heard. As people on a journey with you, may our efforts in the public sphere always reflect the values of your kingdom. And may our voices always be full of peace, patience, kindness and self-control.

May the news we bring be good.

Forgive us, Lord, for the times we’ve failed to speak with a voice of love and grace. Forgive us when we have let attitudes in our heart poison the fruits of your spirit.

We pray especially for Governor Romney and President Obama this morning. Whatever the outcome on Tuesday, we pray that these two prominent leaders in our nation would know your presence in their lives. Help them to seek justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with you. And we pray for their families as they navigate the stresses of life in the public eye.

For our nation, Lord, we pray for more than just civility. We pray for a growing unity, centered around the dignity of all people and the sanctity of all life. May we see a renewal in the recognition that you are the creator of all things and that we are all made in your image, regardless of geography, political philosophy, race, gender, economic status, and any other thing that might divide us.

May your Spirit’s wind blow across this nation, and may it propel us to justice and mercy. May we, your people, be relentlessly committed to listening to your voice and seeking the shalom of our communities, our nation, and our world.

And now, Father, as we prepare our hearts to gather at your table of grace, may we know the assurance of your forgiveness. Renew us and strengthen us in heart, soul, mind and body. May our lives, in word and action, clearly reflect what we believe to be true – that you are the light and hope of the world, and our sure salvation.

We pray all of these things in the name of Christ Jesus, our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, forever and ever.

Amen.

Prayers of the People

 

We’ve been exploring some traditional/historical elements in our services at Pulpit Rock Church. For each of these elements, we put a brief description on the video screens to help our people, as well as visitors, understand the purpose and value of what we’re doing.

The Prayers of the People is a practice found, in various forms, across the liturgical spectrum of the Western Church. The traditional form typically follows a pattern that touches on needs moving from the global to the local. We’ll be exploring various forms at Pulpit Rock, but we’ve been keeping things pretty simple so far.

A few weeks ago, we used the time to focus our prayers on some specific families in significant need in our church. Last week, Jonathan lead a prayer for our city. This week Fiona will lead a prayer for the East Coast storm victims and the upcoming elections.

I’ll post the text for this Sunday’s prayer in a separate post.

 

Who Wants To Settle?

People continue to ask, “Are you settled in now?” – referring to our move to Colorado Springs and my new job at Pulpit Rock Church.

No.

I’m not sure it’s a bad thing. The more I reflect on the last 12 months of life for our family, the more I realize what a tremendous amount of upheaval has been going on. You know those stress indicator tests? I just took this one. I checked a lot of the boxes on the list. No, I checked a lot of the boxes on the list.

“I could be under considerable stress” it said at the end. Good to know.

Here’s what I’ve decided at this point. I’m not sure to what degree I ever want to feel “settled.” I am working in a context where “feeling settled” equals death, in my opinion. Not just for me, but for the community of Pulpit Rock Church, and the greater community we would hope to serve.

Here’s just one example:

Our church building sits up against a neighborhood full of people, as it stretches to the South, thousands of homes and apt. units. That is our “place,” or parish community, if you will. We have very little sense of connection with this community. I do not think we are yet in tune with the needs of that community. I’m not aware that we’ve even been asking the question. We have been asking questions related to growing our church, “doing better ministry” (mostly resource and training oriented inside our walls and families), and how to deal with our financial problems (which pretty much boils down to more people in our model).

This is unsettling to me.

See what I mean?

I would like to lose the stress.

Meanwhile, I’m about to do some traveling and plan to dig back into regular blogging.

Cheers.